
Disability can change the meaning people attach to an accomplishment, even though what the person achieved has not changed. Someone reaches a goal, finishes something difficult, or becomes better at what they do. Once disability becomes part of the description, the accomplishment may be interpreted differently. Skill may be described as inspiring, while effort may be understood as perseverance, meaning continuing despite difficulty or setbacks. The achievement has not changed, but its portrayal and the language surrounding it have.
Disability may be part of what gives an accomplishment its meaning. It can shape how something is learned, how long it takes, or what barriers have to be addressed to complete it. For some people, those experiences are part of what was achieved. For others, disability may be largely incidental. The accomplishment may be better understood through years of study, practice, experience, or work.
National Disability Employment Awareness Month provides a useful context for considering this question. The 2026 theme, “Celebrating Value and Talent,” highlights the skills, abilities, and achievements of people with disabilities in the many roles they hold and the work they do (U.S. Department of Labor, 2026). Recognition can acknowledge disability without changing the meaning or significance of the accomplishment.
Recent research suggests that the way disability is described can affect attitudes toward people with disabilities. In a 2025 experiment, Hammer and Stutts had 246 adults read one of three descriptions. Some read about people with disabilities who were described as successful and managing well in their lives. Others read about people with disabilities whose experiences were described mainly through the difficulties they faced. A third group read about people without disabilities who were described as successful and managing well in their lives.
The differences in the responses were notable. Stigma decreased among participants who read about people with disabilities described as successful and managing well, while it increased among those who read descriptions focused on difficulties. Participants who read about people without disabilities did not show the same change in attitudes. The study does not suggest that difficult experiences should be ignored. Instead, the findings point to how the way disability is presented can influence how people with disabilities are viewed.
Disability and Achievement
Portrayals that recognize the accomplishments of people with disabilities can broaden the way achievement is viewed, which is consistent with recent research on disability and stigma. A more difficult question arises when an accomplishment is described as inspirational mainly because the person has a disability, rather than for the accomplishment itself.
The Burt and McCarty study examined how people respond to disability portrayals that are meant to be inspiring. The study included 296 participants who viewed images of people with visible disabilities taking part in physical activities. Some of the images also included short motivational captions, allowing the researchers to compare reactions to the same kinds of images with and without an inspirational message.
The researchers looked at several possible effects. They examined whether the images increased discomfort or made people less willing to interact with someone with a disability. They also looked at whether the images encouraged participants to see people with disabilities mainly as inspirational figures. Another question was whether disability was understood mostly as a condition or as something also shaped by inaccessible environments, policies, and practices. For most of these measures, the researchers found little difference between the groups. The inspirational material did not broadly change participants’ attitudes in the ways they had expected. The study did, however, find one notable difference.
Participants who saw the inspirational material were less likely to think about people with disabilities in terms of their relationships, concerns, preferences, frustrations, and goals. The emphasis on achievement may have drawn more attention to disability and influenced how the person was perceived.
This raises a broader question about what happens when disability becomes part of the way an accomplishment is presented. Recognition can bring attention to what someone has achieved, while the framing can influence whether the focus stays on the accomplishment or moves toward the person’s disability.
Beyond Achievement
The 2026 NDEAM theme, “Celebrating Value and Talent,” invites a broader look at how talent is recognized. Accomplishments may make talent visible, but skill is often developed over time through practice, experience, and repetition. Recognition, however, can place more attention on the result than on the knowledge, effort, and experience behind it.
Recognition also does not have to depend on exceptional performance. A person may be highly skilled at a job, deeply committed to an interest, or experienced in a particular area without disability becoming the main focus. Sometimes disability is relevant to what a person has experienced or accomplished. In other cases, it may have little connection to what is being recognized.
The research reflects this difference in emphasis. The Hammer and Stutts study found that portrayals of people with disabilities as successful and functioning well could reduce stigma without presenting them mainly as inspirational figures. The Burt and McCarty study examined several possible effects of inspirational portrayals, but most measures showed little difference between groups. The clearest difference was in perception: participants who saw the inspirational portrayals were more likely to focus on disability and less likely to respond to the person as someone with a wider range of traits, concerns, and experiences.
When disability receives particular emphasis, attention can move away from the accomplishment itself. The work may still be recognized, but the emphasis can influence what people notice about it. Disability is not always separate from the work. In some situations, it may affect access, timing, adaptation, or how the work is carried out. In others, it may have little connection to the accomplishment being recognized. The challenge is that disability can sometimes provide important context while also drawing attention away from the skill, knowledge, and experience reflected in the result.
The 2026 NDEAM theme, “Celebrating Value and Talent,” raises several questions worth considering. When an accomplishment by a person with a disability is recognized, what is actually being celebrated? Does mentioning disability explain something important about the work itself, or does it affect how the accomplishment is seen? Would the same work receive the same kind of recognition if disability were not part of the description? When disability is included, does it add relevant context, or does it begin to change how the person and the accomplishment are seen?
References
- Burt, A. H., & McCarty, M. (2024). “The only disability in life is a bad attitude”: A quantitative exploration of the impacts of inspiration porn. Modern Psychological Studies, 30(1), Article 2.
- Hammer, S. T., & Stutts, L. A. (2025). The impact of disability representation on disability stigma in a general population. Rehabilitation Psychology, 70(4), 365-371. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000601
- U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Disability Employment Policy. (2026). National Disability Employment Awareness Month.
Discover more from Wiley's Walk
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.