True inclusion requires more than presence—it calls for shared participation.
Equity involves recognizing the different challenges people may face and making sure everyone has the support, resources, and opportunities they need to be fully included. As groups grow, the goal is not just to add more people, but to build an environment where everyone feels genuinely welcome and able to take part.
When a group grows, it is typically with a clear intention—to create space for broader participation and belonging. At times, that intention succeeds. New voices enter the room and are welcomed. A different perspective finds space and is heard. However, even in these moments, subtle dynamics may remain unchanged.
The ways in which people communicate, shaped by tone, pace, and clarity, often continue to reflect the norms established by those who have been present the longest and whose styles of engagement have traditionally set the standard.
New participants often sense this instinctively. Some join in easily and speak with confidence, quickly picking up the group’s rhythm. Others hesitate, observing and noticing the subtle cues that shape the space. They begin to see which contributions are acknowledged and which are quietly dismissed. They pay attention to tone and timing, and to how decisions are made. Over time, they come to understand what the room seems to expect of them.
In response, people may shift their tone or word choice depending on the setting. For instance, a person who typically uses humor to express themselves might suppress that instinct in formal meetings, having noticed that seriousness is more often equated with competence. Someone who tends to think by talking might start filtering out ideas before speaking, choosing only the ones that sound most complete.
These changes may seem small, but they take real effort. They show up in the quiet pause before someone speaks, or in the uneasy feeling that lingers afterward. Over time, inclusion can start to feel less like being welcomed and more like learning to adjust. It becomes less about an open door, and more about who can adapt to fit the room.
What if inclusion didn’t rely so much on individuals learning to fit in? What if the room could shift—even a little—in response to the people in it? It might start with something as simple as leaving more time between agenda items, giving slower thinkers a chance to catch up.
It could mean offering different ways to contribute: speaking aloud, writing afterward, or sharing in pairs instead of in front of the whole group. It might also involve seeing stories as a form of insight, even when they wander. There could be room for ideas still taking shape, without the pressure to rush them to a conclusion.
When spaces allow for this kind of attention, something begins to shift. People feel they no longer have to leave parts of themselves outside. They start to participate in ways that feel natural instead of calculated. The room itself becomes more than just a setting—it becomes part of the conversation, shaped by the people in it and shaping them in return.
This transition requires deliberate focus. It challenges people to pay attention—not just to what is said, but to how it is said, and who is speaking. Which ideas gain traction easily? Who receives credit, and whose words are echoed without acknowledgment?
Some wait before speaking, listening for a tone that feels familiar or safe. These are difficult questions, with few easy answers. Still, asking them creates space for reflection. And reflection, more often than not, is where real change begins. Small adjustments can open the door to broader shifts. A team might begin meetings with a short written reflection, giving quieter members a chance to articulate their thinking before discussion begins.
A facilitator might develop the habit of asking, “Is there someone we haven’t heard from yet?” instead of relying solely on open-ended invitations. Leaders could begin to notice who tends to speak first and who tends to wait. Rather than drawing conclusions, they might get curious. They might ask whether the structure itself favors certain styles of contribution. These actions show that people are ready to listen and engage. Not every idea will be groundbreaking, but something meaningful is more likely to emerge when people don’t feel the need to filter themselves to fit in. Inclusion then becomes less about who is in the room and more about how they are received.
It is not only about who is present. It is also about how that presence is received. Do people feel truly listened to? Are their words met with thoughtful responses? Are they taken seriously? Often, the smallest moments carry the most weight. A colleague pauses, allowing time for a slow-forming thought to emerge. A leader gives space to someone who rarely speaks. They listen fully, without rushing to reply.
Over time, these gestures begin to reshape the culture of a space. The changes may seem subtle, but their impact is lasting. Sometimes, it’s the simple act of being noticed—even when the words come slowly, the story trails off, or the thought remains unfinished.
Attention, when given with care, fosters understanding. It creates an atmosphere that is intentional rather than rigid, grounded in respect rather than control. It allows people to show up fully. It also does not assume there is only one right way to participate.
In some spaces, participation looks like confident debate. In others, it may involve deep listening. Expression takes many forms—sometimes in asking, sometimes in simply being present. Each style brings something valuable, and when a space is willing to stretch, it allows these differences to coexist. These differences can even inform one another.
This willingness to stretch is not about treating everyone the same. It’s about creating space in different ways for different people. The goal isn’t perfect inclusion or the rejection of structure altogether. Rather, it’s the understanding that structure can evolve. That evolution—often slow and sometimes uncomfortable—helps shape a culture of belonging.
Inclusion is not a fixed outcome but an ongoing practice of care. It takes shape through everyday choices—in how people listen, how spaces are designed, and how difference is acknowledged and valued. It calls for openness to change, even when that change is slow or unfamiliar. What might be possible if spaces adapted to the people in them, instead of expecting people to adapt to the space?
Discover more from Wiley's Walk
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.