Beyond the Sidelines: Mia’s Story

Mia watched the children playing around her, a scene that triggered memories of her own childhood. She remembered a specific incident at a family gathering when she was eight years old. While her cousins laughed and chased each other, Mia sat on the sidelines, her leg braces making it impossible to join in. She vividly recalled how her aunt, meaning well, handed her a book and said, “You can read while they play.” This moment encapsulated her lifelong struggle with feeling different and excluded. Her disability often kept her from participating in play, leaving her feeling like she didn’t belong. This sense of being different shaped how others saw her and how she saw herself.

In psychology, forming self-identity is crucial for mental well-being. People with disabilities often struggle with feeling different, which deeply affects how they view themselves. Research by Gill (1997) shows how social and societal norms, personal encounters with marginalization, and internalized negative attitudes towards disability—known as internalized ableism—shape their self-esteem and sense of worth.

Mia’s experience at the family gathering exemplifies this struggle. While her cousins played, she sat on the sidelines, acutely aware of her exclusion. This was only one of many instances where Mia felt left out. Despite adults’ good intentions, they often talked over or around her, unintentionally reinforcing the idea that her voice mattered less. This repeated marginalization affected Mia’s self-perception, making it hard for her to see her value beyond her disability.

Self-identity often revolves around established norms of those without disabilities, making those who do not fit these norms feel marginalized. Mia’s experience highlights a broader tendency to view disability as a deficiency.

People with disabilities often internalize this view, leading to a conflicted self-identity where their sense of personal worth clashes with feelings of being less worthy or respected. These feelings often arise from negative judgments, discrimination, or marginalization experienced in social interactions and broader societal attitudes (Gill, 1997; Link & Phelan, 2001).

Social Exclusion and Stigma

Social exclusion goes beyond personal interactions and includes systemic barriers in education, employment, and services. These obstacles create environments where people with disabilities are not expected to participate, deepening their sense of alienation. Mia’s experiences in various settings highlight a broader pattern where these barriers limit opportunities and reinforce stigma (Goffman, 1963; Green et al., 2003). For example, when Mia sought employment, she faced subtle discouragement from employers who hinted at less demanding roles, indirectly questioning her abilities.

The stigma associated with disability often intersects with other forms of discrimination, such as race, gender, and socioeconomic status, amplifying the psychological toll. For instance, a person with a disability who also belongs to a racial minority group may face multiple layers of stigma, each contributing to a heightened sense of otherness and marginalization. This intersectionality complicates the challenges they face, emphasizing the importance of recognizing the diverse experiences and identities of individuals with disabilities (Link & Phelan, 2001).

Recent research by Corrigan and Watson (2021) shows that compounded stigma, or the accumulation of multiple stigmas from different aspects of one’s identity, can lead to higher rates of mental health issues. This further impacts Mia’s experiences. She not only faces exclusion due to her disability but also deals with additional challenges related to her gender and socioeconomic background.

Social Interactions

Social interactions profoundly impact the psychological well-being of individuals with disabilities. Goffman’s (1963) theory of stigma shows that people with visible disabilities often endure scrutiny and judgment, leading to social anxiety and avoidance behaviors. This avoidance restricts social opportunities and reinforces feelings of otherness and exclusion. Positive interactions that prioritize inclusion, respect, and empathy can significantly boost self-esteem and psychological health.

For Mia, experiencing genuine respect and inclusion in social activities provided relief from scrutiny (Green et al., 2003). For example, when her neighbor invited her to a community gardening project, Mia felt appreciated and embraced, which was a stark departure from her usual feelings of exclusion. In contrast, the absence of positive interactions and the prevalence of negative, judgmental, or pitying behaviors can worsen psychological distress. People with disabilities may withdraw from social situations to protect themselves from negativity, leading to increased isolation and loneliness.

This cycle of avoiding social interactions reinforces feelings of otherness, making it harder to combat social isolation (Goffman, 1963; Olkin, 1999). For Mia, declining social invitations became a coping mechanism. It shielded her from potential rejection but also hindered the formation of meaningful connections.

Research by Cole and Caltabiano (2019) shows that supportive social networks are vital in reducing the negative psychological impacts of stigma associated with disabilities. These networks offer emotional support, practical help, and a sense of belonging. For Mia, joining a support group was a significant turning point. It allowed her to bond with others who understood her experiences and express herself openly, which helped her combat feelings of alienation.

Internalized Otherness and the Path Forward

Internalizing feelings of otherness can significantly affect one’s well-being. Studies suggest that individuals who internalize negative societal perceptions may experience higher rates of depression and anxiety. Research by Green et al. (2003) revealed a significant link between internalized stigma and depressive symptoms among people with disabilities, highlighting the profound impact of societal views on self-concept.

This process often begins early in life and is reinforced by repeated experiences of exclusion and marginalization. Mia’s experiences reflect this pattern, where each encounter with stigma adds to her feelings of being different and less valued. Over time, this internalized sense of otherness can erode self-confidence and self-worth, creating a pervasive sense of inadequacy. For instance, Mia’s reluctance to pursue higher education stemmed from her belief that her disability would hinder her success.

Addressing internalized otherness requires both individual and collective interventions. Individually, support is needed to challenge and reframe these internalized beliefs, often through counseling and peer support. Collectively, efforts must be made to change the narrative surrounding disability, promoting a perspective that values diversity and inclusion. By addressing both aspects of internalized otherness, we can begin to alleviate its damaging psychological effects.

Community programs that celebrate diversity and inclusion, like inclusive sports teams or artistic groups, can play a vital role in reshaping attitudes and providing positive experiences for individuals with disabilities. These initiatives help create environments where diversity is valued, and everyone has the opportunity to thrive.

Conclusion

Mia’s journey vividly shows how personal experiences shape the identity of individuals with disabilities, from childhood exclusion to adulthood. Her story underscores the toll of stigma and exclusion on mental well-being, revealing how societal norms perpetuate marginalization, especially for those facing multiple forms of discrimination.

Despite these challenges, positive social interactions and supportive communities empower individuals like Mia to confront negative beliefs and affirm their value. Through inclusive environments and diverse representation, barriers can be dismantled. Advocating for positive representation, fostering supportive social networks, and implementing inclusive community programs are crucial for creating a more inclusive environment for individuals with disabilities.

References

  • Cole, S., & Caltabiano, M. (2019). Support networks and psychological well-being. Journal of Disability Studies, 24(3), 225-239. [Article]
  • Corrigan, P. W., & Watson, A. C. (2021). Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness. World Psychiatry, 15(1), 23-30. [Article]
  • Gill, C. J. (1997). Psychological perspectives on disability. Journal of Social Issues, 53(4), 603-621. [Article]
  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall. [Book]
  • Goodley, D. (2020). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. [Book]
  • Green, S. E., Davis, C., Karshmer, E., Marsh, P., & Straight, B. (2003). Living stigma: The impact of labeling, stereotyping, separation, status loss, and discrimination in the lives of individuals with disabilities and their families. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation, 2(2-3), 217-246. [Article]
  • Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363-385. [Article]
  • Olkin, R. (1999). What psychotherapists should know about disability. Guilford Press. [Book]
  • Shakespeare, T. (2018). Disability: The basics. Routledge. [Book]
  • Steinmetz, S. (2022). Empowerment and inclusion programs for individuals with disabilities: A comprehensive review. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 33(1), 56-72. [Article]

Discover more from Wiley's Walk

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

Did you like the blog? Leave a comment!