Disability rights and history are not merely a record of laws and policy changes; they represent the ongoing struggle of individuals fighting for fairness, access, participation, and inclusion. Access means ensuring people with disabilities can fully use services, spaces, and opportunities without barriers. Participation emphasizes the right to be fully involved in all aspects of life, from education to employment.
Inclusion goes beyond mere presence, ensuring that individuals with disabilities are valued and supported, with the same opportunities as everyone else. These principles are the foundation of the disability rights movement and continue to guide efforts toward creating environments where all individuals, regardless of ability, can fully engage and succeed.
This account highlights moments where key events have opened doors that were once closed. While progress has been made, much more remains to be done to ensure equal opportunities for all (Shakespeare, 2020).
In the 1960s and 1970s, people with disabilities began to raise their voices in a way they had not before. They were not asking for special treatment—they simply wanted to be treated the same. They wanted the chance to go to school, work, and to live in the community just like everyone else.
Frustrated by their exclusion, they voiced their demands clearly. This marked the beginning of the Disability Rights Movement, a key moment when individuals with disabilities began to assert their rights, and change gradually began to take shape (Stone, 2023).
One of the most significant early victories came in 1973 with the passage of the Rehabilitation Act, particularly Section 504. This landmark piece of legislation prohibited discrimination against people with disabilities in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance.
For the first time, the U.S. government recognized that people with disabilities have the same rights to fully participate as people without disabilities or many, this law marked a significant step forward, offering hope and proving that the fight for rights could lead to meaningful change. For example, it ensured that people with disabilities could access public buildings, like schools and workplaces, without barriers (Barnartt, 2001).
Another significant moment came in 1975 with the passage of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EHA), which later became the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Before this law, children with disabilities were often kept out of public schools or placed in separate, isolated institutions.
They had little to no access to a proper education. The EHA changed that. For the first time, it guaranteed that every child, regardless of their disability, had the right to attend public school and receive an education in the least restrictive environment. It was not just about education; it was about inclusion, equality, and giving every child the same opportunity to succeed (Stone, 2023).
One of the most powerful actions that defined the movement was the Section 504 Sit-in at the San Francisco Federal Building in 1977. After Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act passed in 1973, its implementation was delayed, leaving millions of people with disabilities without the protections the law promised. In response, over 150 activists organized a 28-day sit-in to demand that the government fully implement the law. They barricaded themselves inside the building, refusing to leave until their demands were met.
Their actions drew national attention and ultimately forced the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) to implement the regulations (Hahn, 1985). This sit-in was a vivid demonstration of the power of direct action, and it is widely considered a turning point in the disability rights movement.
The struggle did not stop there. Protests and sit-ins became a hallmark of the movement in the following decades. For example, ADAPT (Americans Disabled for Accessible Public Transit), an organization formed in 1983, staged numerous protests demanding accessible public transportation.
In 1990, activists famously blocked streets in Washington, D.C., calling for the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). These protests were critical in pushing the disability rights agenda into the public eye, forcing lawmakers and the broader population to confront issues of accessibility and inclusion (Stone, 2023).
The momentum continued to grow, culminating in the signing of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) on July 26, 1990. When the ADA was enacted, it marked a turning point. The law made discrimination against people with disabilities illegal in public spaces, workplaces, and schools.
For the first time, disability was recognized not as something to be overlooked, but as a civil rights issue. The passage of the ADA resulted from years of relentless effort by advocates, some of whom had been fighting for change for decades. The ADA was not merely a law—it was a powerful statement that all individuals, regardless of ability, deserve fair treatment and opportunities (Shakespeare, 2020).
However, as progress advanced, new challenges arose. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), passed on July 3, 2025, poses a serious threat to the gains made in disability rights. The bill will enact cuts Medicaid and CHIP funding by over $1 trillion by 2034, which would directly impact millions of people with disabilities who depend on these programs for essential care.
Medicaid is a key source of funding for home- and community-based services (HCBS), which support individuals with disabilities in living independently within their communities. Without these services, many may face the difficult decision of moving into residential care or other long-term facilities, which could limit their independence and choices.
The bill also introduces new work requirements and documentation rules for Medicaid, making it even harder for people with disabilities to access the care they need. Individuals will have to prove they are working, volunteering, or enrolled in school for a certain number of hours each month in order to keep their benefits.
This is a huge problem for many people with disabilities who face barriers to work, whether it’s due to their condition, transportation issues, or the lack of accessible job opportunities. The new paperwork requirements could also put additional strain on people already struggling to get the care they need.
Rural hospitals are an additional area of concern. While the OBBBA allocates funding to support these hospitals, it falls short of compensating for the substantial Medicaid cuts outlined by the bill. Many rural hospitals provide critical care to a large number of individuals with disabilities, and without adequate financial support, these institutions may be forced to close.
The closure of rural hospitals would severely restrict access to healthcare, making it more difficult for residents to receive necessary care. The Medicaid cuts exacerbate these challenges (Shakespeare, 2020). With fewer hospitals, individuals would be forced to travel long distances for care, a significant hurdle due to limited transportation options. Many, particularly those with disabilities, would lose access to essential services. The Medicaid cuts would further strain resources, complicating the ability of providers to meet the needs of these communities.
As the challenges to access grow, the ongoing struggle for disability rights becomes even more critical. The history of disability rights has been shaped by individuals standing up for what is right and pushing for change, often in the face of significant obstacles.
Key milestones, such as the Rehabilitation Act, the ADA, the EHA, and the Section 504 Sit-in, have each advanced access and participation for people with disabilities. The passage of the OBBBA, however, reminds us that the work is far from finished. While it is important to celebrate past achievements, we must remain aware that new challenges continue to arise.
Advocating for policies that protect the rights of people with disabilities and ensure that they have access to the care, education, and opportunities they deserve remains crucial. The victories achieved so far are important and critical, but they mark only the beginning of the ongoing fight for disability rights.
In conclusion, we should and must ask: How can we protect the progress made in securing the rights of people with disabilities from policies that may reverse those gains? What steps can we take to close the gap between legal advancements and real-world access, especially in rural and underserved communities? And as the political and social landscape changes, how can we work together to create a future that includes everyone? The path forward is in our hands—and it starts with action.
References
- Barnartt, S. N. (2001). Disability, Civil Rights, and Public Policy: The Politics of the ADA. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
- Hahn, H. (1985). The Politics of Disability: A Political Analysis of the Section 504 Sit-In. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 12(4), 380-398.
- Shakespeare, T. (2020). Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. Routledge.
- Stone, R. (2023). The Disability Rights Movement: From Charity to Confrontation. Routledge.
Discover more from Wiley's Walk
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.